Big Changes with Texas Certificates

Are You A Rancher/Farmer in Texas or Do You Have A Rancher/Farmer Customer?  If so, the Texas Sales Tax Law Has Changed for You.

Do you sell to farmers or ranchers in Texas? Then a new law in Texas applies to you. Starting in January, 2012, you’ll have to collect a new certificate from them with their new Comptroller-issued exemption number.

The Comptroller is currently working on the application for a registration number. A farmer/rancher in Texas enjoys a very broad-ranging exemption and until now, there was no need to register. You just buy an exempt item at Home Depot or Lowes or Tractor Supply and sign a statement that you're a rancher and no tax is charged. Now, any store who sells to a rancher will need to collect and manage a new certificate.

Certificate Management Just Got Harder

Many of our clients are experiencing increased sales tax audit liabilities because of missing resale and other exemption certificates. This is an area that states are targeting with laser-like focus. Exemption certificates have always been a problem in most sales tax audits, but as long as you had something on file that you “accepted in good faith”, or if you came up with the missing certificate, the auditors would usually give you a pass. If the item was clearly exempt, they were pretty lenient about the certificates. But states are getting very aggressive; focusing on the technicalities to the extreme. The item may clearly be for resale or exempt like these agricultural items, but it you don’t have the right form completely filled out and signed with a valid id number and the right date, they will tax you all day long til the cows come home. It’s easy, low-hanging fruit.
Read more »

Is an iTune Taxable in California?

How About in Other States?

Back in 2008, we wrote that the CA legislature was contemplating a change to its sales tax statutes to tax downloaded software. As it turned out, they didn’t change the law after all and electronically downloaded music and other digital goods in CA remained exempt from sales/use taxation. Meanwhile, a song purchased on a CD has always been taxable in CA. That may seem a bit unfair. If you buy a song on iTunes and download it to your iPod, you owe no tax in CA, but that same song on a CD is taxable in CA.

This may seem arbitrary and capricious, but there is a reasonable explanation for the different tax treatment.

Read more »

OH SALT Update

Commercial Activities Tax (CAT), Sales & Use Tax, VDAs & Amnesty

By Michael J. Fleming

The State of Ohio and its state and local tax (SALT) policies are currently generating a variety of questions from our clients as well as with others we are speaking with. Since OH is generating so much attention we thought it might be beneficial to share with our readers the subjects that are most frequently arising and provide you with some information as well as our thoughts.

These subjects include OH’s requirement that companies register, file and remit use tax, and the State’s push to go after the 380,000 business who don’t have use tax accounts. We will also take a look at the OH sales tax amnesty that forgives not only all principle and interest but all back sales taxes as well. Finally, we will take a look at the CAT and how you can have nexus without a physical presence.
Read more »

Don't Miss this New Twist to the Washington Tax Amnesty

You might be able to get part of the tax WAIVED along with the penalty and interest

We’ve been beating the drum on the amnesty in Washington for some time. We don’t like to beat the drum too long and loud, but in this case, we feel compelled to call your attention to the opportunity, lest you miss out.

The State is NOT Meeting Their Projections

In December of 2010, during Senate hearings of the Washington State Tax Amnesty (SB 6892), the WA Department of Revenue Interim Director, Tremaine Smith, testified that the proposed Amnesty program was projected to generate $28.3 million. The Amnesty which subsequently passed, began on February 1, 2011 and continues through April 18, 2011, may not meet it’s projections. According to a Tri-City Herald article published 3/24/2011, “5,000 businesses in Washington have taken advantage of a new tax amnesty program and paid more than $12.6 million into the state”. Using those numbers our calculations show that more 70% of the time had elapsed yet less than 45% of the revenue had been generated.
Read more »

BIT, CIT, MBT, MGRT & SBT

News and Views on the Alphabet Soup of MI Taxes

By Michael J. Fleming

On February 17, 2011, as part of his 2012-2013 budget, Michigan Governor, Rick Snyder announced his proposal for the elimination of the Michigan Business Tax (MBT) and for the replacement of it with a flat Corporate Income Tax (CIT) of 6%. While not surprising (it was part of his campaign platform) it is unsettling. You see, the MBT was passed in 2007 but it didn’t replace the Single Business Tax (SBT) until January 1, 2008. Tax professionals are already tasked with knowing both the SBT and MBT. They must retain a working knowledge of the SBT as the audit periods are still open and they obviously must contend with the complexities of the current MBT. Now they must grapple with the reality that they may have another tax to plan for. In theory, you could have a tax professional defending an SBT audit, filing MBT returns and at the same time be involved with tax planning for the CIT. Talk about a heavy workload and it’s not farfetched at all. While we cannot say for sure that the Governor’s CIT will pass, it does seem probable. And there seems to be growing support for the elimination of the MBT. If the MBT is eliminated it will have to be replaced by something. In the meantime, working with the SBT, MBT and it’s component parts the BIT and MGRT will be taxing enough.
Read more »

An Amnesty Worth Its SALT

A look at the B & O, Economic Nexus, Elimination of Physical Presence and Amnesty

By Michael J. Fleming

In the current economic environment, states have a tightrope to walk between balancing the need to increase revenues with the need to save and create jobs. The state of Washington probably thinks it has found a creative way to do both.

Prior to June 1, 2010 many of WA’s in-state companies that provided services were at a competitive disadvantage to out of state companies. In instituting an economic nexus standard in addition to changing the apportionment method for certain companies to “single factor receipts apportionment” WA has leveled the playing field. In fact, many WA companies with out of state sales will see their taxes go down, some substantially.

On the other hand, out-of-state companies who have never worried about the B & O before will now be subject to the WA tax, even if they don’t have a physical presence. Common sense tells us that WA will look at ways to not only make up for the tax relief they have provided their domestic companies, but also to bring in the additional revenues all states are looking for. Increased enforcement of both the B & O and the sales and use tax are two of the most logical ways to do this. Out-of-state companies who are not paying the B & O seem to be likely (and lucrative) targets. The current amnesty program is a useful tool that many taxpayers may or may not take advantage of for a multitude of reasons.
Read more »

You Missed the Tax Amnesty Express

Don’t Worry. You are probably better off with a VDA anyway!

By Michael J. Fleming

Tax Amnesty programs wax and wane in popularity depending on economic conditions. Recently with the depressed economy, Amnesty Programs seem to be all the rage. State and local jurisdictions have been announcing them at a rapid pace with some jurisdictions, like the city of Philadelphia offering one for the first time in 19 years and the state of WA offering the program apparently for the first time ever. The programs usually have short windows of opportunity and require quick action in order to take advantage of the benefits. Many states increase the sense of urgency by threatening increased enforcement actions once the amnesty period ends. A prime example is Pennsylvania, who’s Revenue Secretary, C. Daniel Hassell said, “Before Tax Amnesty ended, we promised to step up enforcement efforts against anyone who did not take advantage ... Now we’re delivering on a second promise, to hold corporate officers personally accountable for taxes their businesses owe.” It is statements like this that have caused many taxpayers who were not able to meet amnesty deadlines to worry that the states will soon be knocking at their door. If you are one of these taxpayers your worries may be over. You may be able to complete a Voluntary Disclosure Agreement (VDA) and actually be better off than if you filed for amnesty.
Read more »

Are You For or Against Amnesty?

by Andrew Johnson, CPA

Tax Amnesty Usually Means No Penalty -- Big Deal! You Still Owe the Tax!
What if I told you: You Can Get Out of the Whole Tax?

It seems like there’s constantly a tax amnesty being offered by some state somewhere. Amnesties can be a sweet deal, that is if you have the money to pay. That’s right, you’ll probably still have to pay the tax. Almost always when a state offers “amnesty” what they’re really offering is to waive the penalties (but not usually all or even some of the interest). Most companies are a little surprised to find this out until they realize what leverage the states really have. They have ways of finding you and in our experience it’s not usually IF they find you but WHEN. When they do find you and determine that you had nexus in their state but weren’t registered and filing tax returns with them, they will bring the hammer down.
Read more »